A Day in the Life at the Hampton's

Thornburgh, Nathan. "INSIDE THE LIFE OF THE MIGRANTS NEXT DOOR." Time 167.6 (2006): 34-45. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 23 Nov. 2010.

Read this article

In Nathan Thornburgh’s opinion, illegal immigrants working in the Hampton’s are hard working people who deserve the chance to make their lives better. While comparing a small city in Mexico with New York’s wealthy Hampton’s, he believes both sides have benefited from immigrants, and both have paid a price. “They came with nothing, and many have managed to build a solid facsimile of middle-class American life.” Still, most of them “are--in the hard parlance of the immigration debate--illegal aliens.” Thornburgh writes, “Illegal immigrants are part of an emerging presence that was once seen as a blessing but has turned into one of the Hamptons' biggest controversies.” In his opinion, the wages in the U.S. are undeniably good for manual labor in the Hamptons. He mentions, as much as $15 an our for manual labor in the Hampton’s which is 10 times the rate for the same rate in Tuxpan Mexico. In Thornburgh’s opinion, the Hampton’s have long cultivated a climate, “of easygoing tolerance, and for years town leaders dealt with illegal immigration by simply looking the other way.” He believes that is changing, as the numbers grow larger and the complaints grow louder. According to Thornburgh, immigrants will always find themselves coming here, “Their safety comes in numbers: hundreds of thousands of migrants will always win a game of Red Rover with a little more than 11,000 border-patrol agents.”

This article is very important because you get to view immigration from an illegal alien’s point of view. The one theme that explains their arrival is their pursuit of happiness. To them being happy is feeding their children, and shelter. Thornburgh interviews and talks with some of the “better off” immigrants and stresses to his readers how hard and dangerous it is to get to America. After reading this article I personally gained a better respect for immigrants and their reasoning for finding their way to America and it has the potential to do the same for others. Thornburgh challenges his readers to put themselves in the shoes of these immigrants in order to better understand them. By explaining the domino effect immigrants’ fall into when one success story leads to 20 more immigrants attempting the same path, the readers can comprehend the huge number of migrants each year. “In 1985 he brought over his half brother Fernando. Fernando invited two friends, who started bringing their relatives. A handful became dozens. Dozens become hundreds.” This article helps form the reader’s opinion on immigration so that they may make wiser political and moral decisions in the future.

The Mayflower From Mexico

Nicholas Thomas L. "America Should Welcome Immigration (1845)." Immigration: Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. Mary Williams. Greenhaven Press, 2004. 17-24. Print.

Preview this book

In Thomas Nichols’ opinion, America should welcome immigration. He believes, “The right of man to emigrate from one country to another, is one which belongs to him by his own constitution and by every principle of justice.” He believes that immigrants have as much right as the first settlers in America because the settlers were technically immigrants themselves and without their pursuit we may not be the country we are today. “They came to improve their condition, to escape from oppression, to enjoy freedom, or similar, reasons as now prevail.” Nichols’ titles one section Let Them Come, and that itself states his opinion. He sees no harm in their presence admits that the worst thing that can be brought against any portion of our foreign population is that in many cases they are poor and will resort to the almshouse. Nickolas ends his viewpoint with this quote, “Alas! Shall the rich, for whom they have labored, the owners of the house they have helped to build, refuse to treat them as kindly as they would their horses when incapable of further toil? Can they grudge them shelter from the storm and a place where they may die in peace?”

The one thing that I believe is so plausible about Nicholas’ opinion is that he brings up immigration from the beginning of European settlers. He compares their impact then and their impact now. Immigration is what started America and Nicholas reminds his readers of that. He also mentions prejudice and how it is a big part of American’s opinion on immigrants. It is very important to recognize prejudice, and set it aside in order to make a fair opinion. When he writes, “Alas! Shall the rich, for whom they have labored, the owners of the house they have helped to build, refuse to treat them as kindly as they would their horses when incapable of further toil? Can they grudge them shelter from the storm and a place where they may die in peace?” the first thing that came to mind was Daniel Millis helping the thirsting immigrants survive the Arizona desert. Nicholas’ source has the potential to change opinions.